议事的科学 - (EPUB全文下载)

文件大小：8.86 mb。
文件格式：epub 格式。
书籍内容：

第 1 部分决策方法决定历史
主要参考文献
第 1 部分　决策方法决定历史
第 1 章　选举结果能体现民意吗？
Rae D W, Daudt H. The Ostrogorski paradox: a peculiarity of compound majority decision[J]. European Journal of Political Research, 1976, 4(4): 391-398.
Riker W H. The two-party system and Duverger's law: an essay on the history of political science[J]. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76(4): 753-766.
Duverger's Law of plurality voting: The logic of party competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States[M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
第 2 章　“民主的”决策方法——博尔达计数法
Coughlin P. A direct characterization of Black's first borda count[J]. Economics Letters, 1979, 4(2): 131-133.
Emerson P. Designing an all-inclusive democracy: Consensual voting procedures for use in parliaments, councils and committees[M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
Emerson P. From Majority Rule to Inclusive Politics[M]. Springer, 2016.
McLean I, Urken A.Classics of social choice[M]. University of Michigan Press, 1995.
第 3 章　选项之间的单挑——循环赛
Kurrild-Klitgaard P. An empirical example of the Condorcet paradox of voting in a large electorate[J]. Public Choice, 2001, 107(1-2): 135-145.
Tabarrok A. President Perot or fundamentals of voting theory illustrated with the 1992 election[J]. Public Choice, 2001, 106(3): 275-297.
De Condorcet N. Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
第 4 章　决策方法决定历史
大沢秀介. 現代型訴訟の日米比較[M]. 弘文堂, 1988.
Riker W H. Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice[M]. Waveland Press, Incorporatedcc1982., 1982.
McLean I. William H. Riker and the Invention of Heresthetic (s)[J]. British Journal of Political Science, 2002, 32(3): 535-558.
Tabarrok A. President Perot or fundamentals of voting theory illustrated with the 1992 election[J]. Public Choice, 2001, 106(3): 275-297.
Mackie G. Democracy defended[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Jenkins J A, Morris I L. Running to Lose?: John C. Breckinridge and the Presidential Election of 1860[J]. Electoral Studies, 2006, 25(2): 306-328.
Robert H M. Robert's Rules of Order Revised for Deliberative Assemblies[M]. Scott, Foresman, 1915.
第 2 部分　哪种决策方法最适合选项多于三个的投票
第 5 章　盘点决策方法——全胜者与全败者
Nurmi H. An assessment of voting system simulations[J]. Public Choice, 1992, 73(4): 459-487.
Brams S, Fishburn P C. Approval voting[M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
Black D, Newing R A, McLean I ............

书籍插图：

以上为书籍内容预览，如需阅读全文内容请下载EPUB源文件，祝您阅读愉快。